A prospective tenant looking at a property image needs to understand what it represents. Is it a photograph of the premises today, an illustration of a proposed fit-out or a concept showing one possible use of the space?

Joe Sokolic, founder and CEO of Sokolic Property Group, believes that distinction should remain obvious as property businesses explore AI-generated visual material.

“An image should help someone understand the opportunity accurately,” says Sokolic. “If it shows a possible future arrangement, the viewer should know that before forming an expectation about the property.”

A concept can have a useful role. An empty office may be difficult for an occupier to imagine in use. An illustrative layout could help start a conversation about workstations, meeting areas or reception space. It becomes problematic if the presentation implies that those elements already exist or can definitely be delivered.

Sokolic proposes that conceptual images carry clear descriptions alongside them. The actual condition of the premises should remain visible through current photographs and verified information. Material questions about dimensions, services, permissions and feasibility should be investigated separately.

“A picture can open a discussion about potential,” he says. “It cannot confirm the technical or commercial conditions that make that potential achievable.”

Consider a hypothetical warehouse illustration that adds generous circulation space around storage racks. The image might look convincing while failing to reflect the building’s actual dimensions or operational constraints. A broker should not allow visual polish to become an implied assurance about how the premises will function.

The same care applies to simpler editing. Changes that affect a viewer’s understanding of condition, access, surroundings or available space need particular scrutiny. The team should be able to explain what has been altered and why the image is being used.

Database management can support that process. Each asset should have a clear description, an origin, a review date and an indication of whether it depicts existing conditions or a proposed concept. Outdated visuals should not continue circulating after the property changes.

This is also a distribution issue. An explanatory caption can disappear when an image is copied into another channel. The presentation should anticipate that possibility so that essential context remains attached wherever practical.

For Sokolic, the commercial objective is to attract informed interest. A viewing that begins with disappointment over an inaccurate impression creates avoidable friction for everyone involved.

“Property marketing should make the real opportunity easier to see,” he says. “Our credibility depends on the connection between what people are shown and what they find when they arrive.”

Continue the conversation

Want to discuss your property requirements, explore the ideas in this article, or arrange a media interview with Joe Sokolic? Contact the Sokolic Property Group marketing team.

Contact our marketing team

We also welcome speaking opportunities and collaboration enquiries. Know someone who would find this article useful? Share it with your colleagues or professional network.